Quote:
Originally Posted by dewi 
It is not necessary to define something that is "physiologically normal", what gets defined is when it becomes "not normal".
|
That
should be true, but unfortunately it's not. The medical establishment has messed with labor so thoroughly for so long that "normal" rarely exists any more, and the average medical practitioner wouldn't know normal if it bit them. If you're looking for "normal", you're stuck looking at HB, BC or UC births for the most part, which leaves you with a very small sample size. That's part of why you will have great difficulty finding statistics.
And I seem to recall reading that the WHO originally wanted to place the number under 10%, but the advisers balked because they didn't think the medical establishment would even try to hit that number (not that they're trying to hit 15%). I think it would be more accurate to say that
at least 85% of all labors should be normal, if the medical establishment would stop interfering.