Mothering Forum banner
1 - 20 of 39 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
2,250 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Poverty Dramatically Affects Children's Brains

Quote:
A new study finds that certain brain functions of some low-income 9- and 10-year-olds pale in comparison with those of wealthy children and that the difference is almost equivalent to the damage from a stroke.

"It is a similar pattern to what's seen in patients with strokes that have led to lesions in their prefrontal cortex," which controls higher-order thinking and problem solving, says lead researcher Mark Kishiyama, a cognitive psychologist at the University of California-Berkeley. "It suggests that in these kids, prefrontal function is reduced or disrupted in some way."
I don't even know what to say. This is just scary.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20,366 Posts
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,741 Posts
I thought that was common knowledge, seriously. Kids who don't eat well or get the education they have the potential for, or are free from the toxic conditions of being very poor (chemicals, etc) will probably do worse then their rich counter parts who eat better, have a good education and aren't exposed to animal feces, chemicals, etc...it obviously doesn't fit for all poor kids but it's very true for many.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,250 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Well, the difference in knowledge for me, after reading the article, is that it literally creates a change in the brain. I chalked up difficulties to...just...circumstances, I guess. I didn't think it could literally change the brain structure.

This is why I am hoping our country really can become a little more socialistic. We need to take better care of kids. Period.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,818 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by Valkyrie9 View Post
Well, the difference in knowledge for me, after reading the article, is that it literally creates a change in the brain. I chalked up difficulties to...just...circumstances, I guess. I didn't think it could literally change the brain structure.

This is why I am hoping our country really can become a little more socialistic. We need to take better care of kids. Period.

I agree with you- it's inexcusable! These kids can never overcome the effects of brain damage and pull themselves up by their bootstraps and become CFOs. This is what conservatives have attributed to laziness and lack of personal responsibility.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,658 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by mamajama View Post
It's so sad and unfair.


I expect it has a lot to do with stress.
:
This really breaks my heart.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
9,652 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by Synthea™ View Post
I thought that was common knowledge, seriously. Kids who don't eat well or get the education they have the potential for, or are free from the toxic conditions of being very poor (chemicals, etc) will probably do worse then their rich counter parts who eat better, have a good education and aren't exposed to animal feces, chemicals, etc...it obviously doesn't fit for all poor kids but it's very true for many.
Um, yeah. I completely agree with you. It's sad that I do, but there it is.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,472 Posts
This is so terrible. I hope this research will lead to programs to help children however, not remove children because of poverty. Often times the parents are struggling very hard to change their family's situation but not having any luck. I wonder what qualified as "poverty" in this study? Because you see, if you go solely by income levels, there are many children who would be considered to live in poverty but in actuality, don't. For example, right now, my income is far below the poverty level because I am a student (and am currently disabled due to illness so couldn't work if I wanted to), and my husband (due to lack of education) works jobs that aren't well above the minimum wage. Based on that alone, we would fit the criteria for poverty. However, because of sec. 8, we live in a nice apartment in a good area of town, with good schools, and a very low crime rate. We still struggle very much to pay our bills each month, but because of food stamps, our children do eat well. Education is big in our family and I make sure my kids are doing well in school and eating the right foods. No, we don't have any "extras" so my kids I guess to miss out on that, and we don't have expensive gadgets, or name-brand clothes, or a lot of toys, but we do at least have the basics. I wonder if it was a whole combination of factors that lead to kids having brain damage? Which brings me back to my original question: I wonder what made the families fit the criteria for "poverty", because there are so many other factors, like whether the family had adequate housing with utilities, the parenting styles (the stress of poverty can certainly have a large impact on parenting), nutritional factors, whether or not the family was having problems due to drugs or domestic violence (statistically, families who live in poverty are more likely to be affected by drugs and domestic violence, although of course there certainly doesn't mean every family living in poverty will be). I'm just saying that I don't think not having enough money alone can always have such a detrimental effect on children or any one effect of poverty alone, I think that it has to be a lot of factors working together. I think that specifically nutrition probably has a lot to do with it (probably a main causative factor, at least in my opinion), and probably stress. I would hypothesize a stressful environment, especially early in life, could probably affect cognitive development especially when combined with other effects.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,777 Posts
There is a modest correlation between intelligence and income so some of the results are probably due to genetics. And while the study says that prenatal drug use was ruled out, how did they rule it out? Did they have blood/ hair samples from the moms?

I bet prenatal nutrition, infant nutrition (the poor are more like to bottle feed), and early childhood nutrition are significant factors too.

I read an article a year or so ago about infant mortality in poorer areas of the south. Many of the women were morbidly obese (which also correlates with poverty, and can cause birth complications) and were clueless about nutrition. I remember one woman being quoted as saying she ate nothing but chips and soda through her whole pregnancy because it was good for her baby.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,818 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by meowee View Post
There is a modest correlation between intelligence and income so some of the results are probably due to genetics. And while the study says that prenatal drug use was ruled out, how did they rule it out? Did they have blood/ hair samples from the moms?

I bet prenatal nutrition, infant nutrition (the poor are more like to bottle feed), and early childhood nutrition are significant factors too.

I read an article a year or so ago about infant mortality in poorer areas of the south. Many of the women were morbidly obese (which also correlates with poverty, and can cause birth complications) and were clueless about nutrition. I remember one woman being quoted as saying she ate nothing but chips and soda through her whole pregnancy because it was good for her baby.
I'm sorry, I must have missed it but-- What is your point?
 
1 - 20 of 39 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top