Joined
·
876 Posts
<div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">
<div>Originally Posted by <strong>mamakay</strong> <a href="/community/forum/post/9633931"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/community/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style="border:0px solid;"></a></div>
<div style="font-style:italic;">I noticed that, too...<br><br><br>
Wasn't it just one monkey that happened to?</div>
</td>
</tr></table></div>
In that report yes, but also in previous reports by different investigators.<br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">Oh...and about this:<br><br>
They still couldn't really correlate the supposed protective titre with a reduction in incidence though. A lot of them should have been protected (according to what ever they were calling the correlate of protection for a monkey...not sure if they borrowed it from humans or what there) but the incidence wasn't reduced.<br><br>
But either way, the second dose does appear to have done something good.</td>
</tr></table></div>
No, the one vaccination did nothing so who knows what and how old the one dose was. They did use the human value of >0.01 IU but the WHO reference standard is >0.1 IU. Stuff like this drives me wonky.<br><br>
SM
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">
<div>Originally Posted by <strong>mamakay</strong> <a href="/community/forum/post/9633931"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="/community/img/forum/go_quote.gif" style="border:0px solid;"></a></div>
<div style="font-style:italic;">I noticed that, too...<br><br><br>
Wasn't it just one monkey that happened to?</div>
</td>
</tr></table></div>
In that report yes, but also in previous reports by different investigators.<br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">
<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">Oh...and about this:<br><br>
They still couldn't really correlate the supposed protective titre with a reduction in incidence though. A lot of them should have been protected (according to what ever they were calling the correlate of protection for a monkey...not sure if they borrowed it from humans or what there) but the incidence wasn't reduced.<br><br>
But either way, the second dose does appear to have done something good.</td>
</tr></table></div>
No, the one vaccination did nothing so who knows what and how old the one dose was. They did use the human value of >0.01 IU but the WHO reference standard is >0.1 IU. Stuff like this drives me wonky.<br><br>
SM