Today's Washington Post editorial makes a salient point:
"In December 2002, Mr. Rumsfeld approved a series of harsh questioning methods for use at the Guantanamo Bay base. According to the Wall Street Journal, these included the removal of clothing, the use of "stress positions," hooding, "fear of dogs," and "mild non-injurious physical contact." Even before that, the Journal reported, interrogators at Guantanamo forced prisoners to wear women's underwear on their heads. A year later, when some of the same treatment was publicized through the Abu Ghraib photographs, Mr. Rumsfeld described it as "grievous and brutal abuse and cruelty.""
More here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer
Anyone who thinks that one cannot infer that the "terrorists are winning" in light of the fact that this nation's government is stooping to this level, should step back and think about this belief.
"In December 2002, Mr. Rumsfeld approved a series of harsh questioning methods for use at the Guantanamo Bay base. According to the Wall Street Journal, these included the removal of clothing, the use of "stress positions," hooding, "fear of dogs," and "mild non-injurious physical contact." Even before that, the Journal reported, interrogators at Guantanamo forced prisoners to wear women's underwear on their heads. A year later, when some of the same treatment was publicized through the Abu Ghraib photographs, Mr. Rumsfeld described it as "grievous and brutal abuse and cruelty.""
More here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer
Anyone who thinks that one cannot infer that the "terrorists are winning" in light of the fact that this nation's government is stooping to this level, should step back and think about this belief.