Joined
·
3,197 Posts
I don't want to start another Tv/TV-Free argument, but I am curious and want to collect some data about the whole sordid issue.
DH and I are TV-free by virture of being a) busy and b) poor. We own a television set and watch movies, but we don't have cable, and ergo don't get TV stations. I can't imagine that we'd bother to change this when DC come along, so for us, it isn't so much an issue of being "TV Free" as it is an issue of continuing to be lazy.
But it seems to be that this is *not* the case for the majority of families who find TV to be an issue? I'm wondering if those of you who are "TV Free" watched television prior to having children, and then felt the need to cut down because of DC or family life in general, or if you've always been not interested in televison?
DH and I are TV-free by virture of being a) busy and b) poor. We own a television set and watch movies, but we don't have cable, and ergo don't get TV stations. I can't imagine that we'd bother to change this when DC come along, so for us, it isn't so much an issue of being "TV Free" as it is an issue of continuing to be lazy.
But it seems to be that this is *not* the case for the majority of families who find TV to be an issue? I'm wondering if those of you who are "TV Free" watched television prior to having children, and then felt the need to cut down because of DC or family life in general, or if you've always been not interested in televison?