You know what's weird about this? By making Zarqawi's role seem larger, they had persuaded me that the Iraq policy was mistaken. After all, there wasn't a major al-Qaeda presence in Iraq before the war. Now suddenly you have jihad-tourists in Iraq, doesn't that show that the war was a mistake?
And here I'm learning that in fact it was to magnify the role of international terror that Zarqawi's name was kept in the news, and to change Iraqi perceptions of the US.
So that means what? that the Bush administration didn't want to admit that the resistance to the US invasion was mainly Iraqis? But we knew that, right?
I have to say that most of the Bush administrations' policies seem to boomerang on them.
And here I'm learning that in fact it was to magnify the role of international terror that Zarqawi's name was kept in the news, and to change Iraqi perceptions of the US.
So that means what? that the Bush administration didn't want to admit that the resistance to the US invasion was mainly Iraqis? But we knew that, right?
I have to say that most of the Bush administrations' policies seem to boomerang on them.