Mothering Forum banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
461 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Memorial Hospital at Easton is now the ONLY hospital in Maryland that doesn't allow women to choose to have a VBAC. Any Easton moms want to get involved in getting this reversed?

-Barbara Stratton [email protected]

<<Memorial state¹s only hospital not offering VBAC

By SARAH ENSOR PEARCE
Staff Writer
EASTON < The Memorial Hospital at Easton is the only hospital in the state
not offering vaginal birth after Cesarean section (VBAC) now that Frederick
Memorial Hospital has decided to again offer the procedure, according to
Barbara Stratton, leader of the International Cesarean Awareness Network
Baltimore Chapter.
Although Frederick Memorial stopped performing the procedure in fall 2004,
activists protested what they perceived as a ban. Easton Memorial has not
allowed the procedure since September 2003. In fall 2004, Shore Health
System spokesman Patti Willis said some patients were unhappy when Easton
Memorial stopped performing VBACs, but there were no organized protests
outside the hospital.
VBAC is a procedure during which a mother gives birth to a baby vaginally
after she has given birth to another child via Cesarean section. The
procedure carries a risk of uterine rupture along the Cesarean line of
incision.
³Cesareans certainly carry their own risks,² said Stratton.
Stratton said she supports a woman¹s right to choose how she gives birth.
She said VBACs can be very safe as long as labor is not artificially induced
or rushed. Only a fraction of uterine ruptures are catastrophic, she said,
defining catastrophic as loss of baby¹s or mother¹s life. The bikini-cut
incision, which is more common now than traditional vertical incisions, is
less likely to rupture, Stratton said.
³I feel strongly that VBAC is a very reasonable choice for women,² she said.
Some caregivers were sued when women or babies died during induced VBACs,
Stratton said. Then, care-givers and insurance carriers began backing away
from VBACs altogether.
Stratton said women who cannot have a VBAC at Easton Memorial have to drive
a long distance to give birth elsewhere, when giving birth closer to home
would be safer.
But safety is the primary reason Easton Memorial does not offer VBACS.
Patty McNeal, manager of the birthing center and pediatrics at Easton
Memorial, said Easton Memorial does not offer the procedure because the
hospital does not have in-house anesthesia services. Although the hospital
can do Cesareans, an anesthesiologist may not be available as quickly as
necessary, should a VBAC have complications.
McNeal said women sometimes want a VBAC because pain is less severe and
recovery time is much shorter than for a Cesarean.
According to Easton Memorial¹s policy, ³The Joint Commission on
Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has adopted the American
College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) standards applicable to
hospitals performing VBAC deliveries. The ACOG Standards include the
immediate ability to perform emergency cesarean section for failed VBAC
delivery. OImmediate¹ means that the surgeon/gynecologist, the
anesthesiologist and the OR (operating room) team are either on site or can
be on site within minutes.²
In fall 2004, Willis said physicians at Easton Memorial have helped find
care elsewhere for patients who insist on VBACs.>>
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,396 Posts
WOW, talk about taking away a womans right to choose!

"McNeal said women sometimes want a VBAC because pain is less severe and
recovery time is much shorter than for a Cesarean."

Anyone else also feel this is a very missleading statement? How about because they want to give birth the way women are meant to give birth?

The whole think stinks.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,828 Posts
i didn't know that. i gave birth there last fall--travelled 1.5 hours instead of using my local hospital because their policies and practices were more aligned with my beliefs about birthing. i had a great experience there. sad to hear they won't allow v-bacs.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
585 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by hillymum
"McNeal said women sometimes want a VBAC because pain is less severe and
recovery time is much shorter than for a Cesarean."

Anyone else also feel this is a very missleading statement? How about because they want to give birth the way women are meant to give birth?
That's the only reason I want a vbac.
: I just don't get it. So many doctors make it sound like the risks of vbac are huge when they really aren't that big. It's not like the risk of having major abdominal surgery is zero.

I hope the doctors are letting their patients know the ban is lifted. I saw a perinatologist in Frederick a week ago and he told me I needed to get my c-section scheduled at 37 weeks because I couldn't vbac at the hospital. He wasn't even aware the ban was lifted.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
461 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
No difference. What do they do for non-birth related emergencies? Frederick Memorial admitted that they added more anesthesiology coverage and L & D staffing in response to just such a criticism after our VBAC ban rally.

We've had one VBAC at Frederick (that I know of) since the reversal. Literally, just 7 days later and the OB on-call didn't know about the reversal so I guess they havn't broadcasted the info yet.

Its important that Easton area moms who are upset with the policy let the hospital know it. Plus, stopping the ban at one hospital sends a message to others in Maryland that we won't tolerate this limitation of our patient rights.

-Barbara
 

· Registered
Joined
·
509 Posts
Wow I just gave birth there 9 weeks ago, and it was wonderful. (The nurses there were awesome and helped me out A LOT with getting started BFing.) I'm surprised to hear they don't allow VBACs.
Should we start a petition or something??
 

· Registered
Joined
·
391 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by womancaredoula
But safety is the primary reason Easton Memorial does not offer VBACS.
Patty McNeal, manager of the birthing center and pediatrics at Easton
Memorial, said Easton Memorial does not offer the procedure because the
hospital does not have in-house anesthesia services. Although the hospital
can do Cesareans, an anesthesiologist may not be available as quickly as
necessary, should a VBAC have complications.
Well... that's kinda silly... what about Emergency C-sections? It's not just VBACs gone south that land someone in an emergency c-section situation...

It just sounds like a cop out...
:

ETA: Or as Barbara mentioned what about for other non birth anesthesia needs.
"Oh... we're sorry that you've been in a major accident and are suffering life threatening injuries. Our anesthesiologist is out of pocket... you'll have to cling to dear life while we find someone who can prep you for surgery. Hope you don't mind waiting..." I think not!
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top