Joined
·
1,822 Posts
I am looking for some different perspective. I wasn't sure where to post this but this seemed the most logical spot, but if it needs moved that's OK too.<br><br>
I am a vegetarian currently. With the except of two meals a few weeks ago I have had no animal products that required the animal to die for almost seven years. We do eat eggs (local free range only, I refuse to buy them in a grocery store), and drink milk (we are not able to get raw milk here, so we are switching to unhomogenized whole milk from homogenized whole milk).<br><br>
OK that being said our family decided to try out an omnivorous diet for the first time (as a family, both my partner and I had eaten meat before). Like I said, I made it two meals before the ethical/moral side of me just couldn't. It's been so long and it's such a huge change for me.<br><br>
So I've been doing lots of reading (currently Animal, Vegetable, Miracle) and I saw Food Inc. None of the information is really "new" for me in the sense of shocking me but it has got me thinking a lot about the merits of a local diet (which I already believed in and we do utilize our local resources some now).<br><br>
So in thinking about our diet I'm pretty sure I could do a nearly completely local diet if we ate meat. I can get grass fed (organic too although not certified) meat, right down to the bones for stock. I can also get veggies and fruits at the farmers market in the summer. I believe I've even found a source for local grains that is not far from me.<br><br>
If we continue to be vegetarian I can't get our diet that high of a percentage of local. We can't eat eggs at every meal and the dairy we have is not local (although it would be raw cheese and unhomogenized milk through a local coop supporting a local small business). I really feel like getting away from processed foods is so ideal, but I need a lot of protein these days and have been relying on foods like peanut butter, tofu, meat replacements like veggie burgers, veggie faux meats etc (I realize the contents of these but they are so quick... which is part of the problem).<br><br>
Taking into consideration personal/family health (we are for reference a family of four... me: early 20's, good physical health, active, pregnant, nursing a baby and a preschooler still; DP: mid 20's, good physical health although underweight, active; DS1: 3.5 years old, good physical health, active; and DS2: 15 months old, anemic, problems with apnea while sleeping, gets sick more than the rest of us, active and happy though); as well as considering the effect on the food we eat (given that an animal has to give it's life for us to eat it which is a significant thing for me to consider), the environment, and the people producing, processing, transporting, and selling the food... which is "better"?<br><br>
More local with more animals or less local with less animals (and no animals dying)?
I am a vegetarian currently. With the except of two meals a few weeks ago I have had no animal products that required the animal to die for almost seven years. We do eat eggs (local free range only, I refuse to buy them in a grocery store), and drink milk (we are not able to get raw milk here, so we are switching to unhomogenized whole milk from homogenized whole milk).<br><br>
OK that being said our family decided to try out an omnivorous diet for the first time (as a family, both my partner and I had eaten meat before). Like I said, I made it two meals before the ethical/moral side of me just couldn't. It's been so long and it's such a huge change for me.<br><br>
So I've been doing lots of reading (currently Animal, Vegetable, Miracle) and I saw Food Inc. None of the information is really "new" for me in the sense of shocking me but it has got me thinking a lot about the merits of a local diet (which I already believed in and we do utilize our local resources some now).<br><br>
So in thinking about our diet I'm pretty sure I could do a nearly completely local diet if we ate meat. I can get grass fed (organic too although not certified) meat, right down to the bones for stock. I can also get veggies and fruits at the farmers market in the summer. I believe I've even found a source for local grains that is not far from me.<br><br>
If we continue to be vegetarian I can't get our diet that high of a percentage of local. We can't eat eggs at every meal and the dairy we have is not local (although it would be raw cheese and unhomogenized milk through a local coop supporting a local small business). I really feel like getting away from processed foods is so ideal, but I need a lot of protein these days and have been relying on foods like peanut butter, tofu, meat replacements like veggie burgers, veggie faux meats etc (I realize the contents of these but they are so quick... which is part of the problem).<br><br>
Taking into consideration personal/family health (we are for reference a family of four... me: early 20's, good physical health, active, pregnant, nursing a baby and a preschooler still; DP: mid 20's, good physical health although underweight, active; DS1: 3.5 years old, good physical health, active; and DS2: 15 months old, anemic, problems with apnea while sleeping, gets sick more than the rest of us, active and happy though); as well as considering the effect on the food we eat (given that an animal has to give it's life for us to eat it which is a significant thing for me to consider), the environment, and the people producing, processing, transporting, and selling the food... which is "better"?<br><br>
More local with more animals or less local with less animals (and no animals dying)?