[inky leeuhhh]

sized fb med, or fb os?

 

[chely7425]

I think it totally depends on your LO... from my experience I didn't notice much of a rise difference between the OS and the medium, and both my 11 month old and 25 month old can wear the mediums just fine, with room to grow. Personally I prefer the sized ones, but if you have a skinny and tall baby I would say the OS might be better since it is more adjustable.

 

[inky leeuhhh]

thanks. a skinny and tall baby is just about the opposite of my dd. LOL.

 

[SleeplessMommy]

our baby is at about 16 pounds right now (5 months). the FB OS is noticeably narrower at the crotch than the fb M. we use fb (M) as a night time dipe and the fb os very rarely ... just not as thrilled with the fit and smaller room for the soaker.<br><br>
Holding the 2 dipes up together, the OS back and fronts are the same width. My fb M (from last year - no hip snap) has the same number of snaps in the lower row, but 1 less snap on each side in the upper row... it will adjust to the same max size for lower row, but about 1" smaller in the upper.<br><br>
FB M fit baby starting at 10-12 pounds, we used prefolds before that. I would go with FB M unless you expect the baby to grow very slowly to 12 pounds. (preemie for example)

 

[inky leeuhhh]

yeah we are going with the fb med. theyre on sale at the seconds store with the inserts