Which is more reliable, IYO?

I ask because FF and Ovusoft consistently give me different cover lines. LOL And it irritates me.

I charted on both for a while and didn't like FF's calculations at all. Ovusoft seems to "get" my body better.

YMMV

Jess

I wanna know this, too!

I wonder if FF is too sensitive to pick up o when someone really doesn't o.

OTOH, I have seen so many pregnancy charts on ff (yes I have a problem, I have been visiting the chart galleries late at night :LOL ) that I don't think would have even gotten a coverline from ovusoft. So far I like how ff has the different detectors. If you think ovusoft is better, you can use the fertility awareness method detector at ff --that should be the same as what ovusoft does, no?

I like Ff simply because, to me, it is more user friendly.

I also use both, but I prefer Ovusoft. I started with it, so I know better how it works. I only started ff because for the life of me I couldn't figure out how to publish my charts, to link it in my sig. Can you help me figure it out?

Danielle, when you click to publish your chart (on your PC) - don't press "Quickie". Press next, etc. until it brings you to the final screen where it shows the URL to your chart (that's the URL you put in your sig). Do you what I'm talking about?

If you don't know how to publish it... click on "Chart" (as opposed to "calendar") and that's where the publish button is - in the top right.