Mothering Forum banner
1 - 19 of 19 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,350 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Someone said recently they wanted to nightwean when 4 month old babe reaches 6 months so they can "get their sleep back". It totally went against what feels right for me but I couldn't back up my point with evidence....so what do I do? Come to MDC! Input anyone?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,360 Posts
Nightweaning doesn't mean you get your sleep back. You can nightwean at any age and still have a baby who wakes frequently at night. You'll just have a nightwaking baby who can't be easily soothed back to sleep at the breast.

I don't know why your friend thinks six months is a magic age (is she formula feeding?).

At any rate, many breastfed babies at that age still need nutrition during the night. Heck, my almost 3 year old (nightweaned since around 27 months) still wakes occassionally at night and asks for cheerios b/c he's hungry.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
81 Posts
People are crazy! It drives me nuts when I hear stuff like this. A six month old baby would DEFINITELY still get hungry at night!! And I agree that the baby would very likely still wake up but then the parents would get a lot less sleep if their not letting the baby breastfeed. My 2 1/2 year old still wants the breast during the night for comfort and I almost always give it to him because it is the EASIEST thing for me to do in the middle of the night when I'm tired, etc.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,574 Posts
There are lots of reasons but the topper for me is I get way more sleep if I just roll over and pop a boob in dd's mouth and we both fall back asleep than if I try to get her to go to sleep without nursing. She is almost 23mos and still night nurses and co-sleeps.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,280 Posts
my doctor thinks 4 months is a good time to start nightweaning

Totally OT, but anyone else tired of docs giving non-medical advice? The other thing that irks me is the one-size-fits-all parenting input. You can see by the responses here that many kids, even though they "should" be able to get through the night without eating (according to docs - btw, where's THAT research?), just can't because they're HUNGRY!

My dd (one year old) can typically sleep six to eight hours at night without eating, but lately she is eating like a MONSTER and needing to nurse more frequently. Things change with kids all the time, don't they?

I'm having a similar conversation with a friend about a friend of hers who seems more attached to her schedule than to her child, unfortunately.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,692 Posts
Quote:
Nightweaning doesn't mean you get your sleep back. You can nightwean at any age and still have a baby who wakes frequently at night. You'll just have a nightwaking baby who can't be easily soothed back to sleep at the breast.
This. Just look around any sleep support group - just as many formula fed and night weaned babies wake at night - it just means you have to pace the floor with them rather than grabbing them and popping a boob in.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,405 Posts
I find that an argument that works better when people say to night wean at this age is "what will he do if he gets thirsty?"

After all, I may not get hungry very often in the middle of the night, but I do get thirsty - and being an adult, I put a glass of water next to my bed.

With ds1, when we nightweaned him at 14 months by putting him in his own room, we also would always leave a cup of water with him so he could get a drink if he were thirsty.

Just my 2 cents.

Siobhan
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,405 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by ktmama
My dd (one year old) can typically sleep six to eight hours at night without eating, but lately she is eating like a MONSTER and needing to nurse more frequently. Things change with kids all the time, don't they?
Yup, it'll be teething (those toddler molars are a bitch!), illness, a change in the household or schedule, bad weather, growth spurt, whatever.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,692 Posts
Quote:

Originally Posted by royaloakmi
Nightweaning doesn't mean you get your sleep back. You can nightwean at any age and still have a baby who wakes frequently at night. You'll just have a nightwaking baby who can't be easily soothed back to sleep at the breast.
That.

I'm in a group of non-CIOers on another forum, and the FF and weaned babies take much more work to put back to sleep.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,407 Posts
My response to a comment like that would be something like "I am in tune with my child's needs and feeding at night helps to soothe him/her back to sleep and I think that refusing feeding would be counterproductive. A baby will self nightwean when ready."
 

· Registered
Joined
·
165 Posts
Wow, 6 months?? First, I agree with a pp, simply night weaning will not mean that a babe doesn't wake up, only that it will take much much longer to put them back to sleep.

Our DD is a year old. I can tell when she wakes because she is hungry or when she just needs her pacifier and can't reach it. When she is hungry, I nurse her, and when she just needs her pacifier or to be held, I do that.
I can't imagine not feeding her simply because the Dr. said not to
: or b/c I MAY get to sleep faster. If she's hungry, I know it'll take twice as long to get her back to sleep if I don't feed her. I know when I'm hungry in the middle of the night, I want cereal, not someone rocking me.
:
:
 
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top