Joined
·
3,953 Posts
i am not a birth professional. a good friend of mine had FOUR vaginal births before having a csec for #5. she is now 6mos pg with baby #6. there will be about 20 or so mos between the csec and the next birth.<br><br>
of course the csec was not planned. it also was not emergent. it was due to horrible mismanagement of a labor that deviated from the mother's normal. the next day the OB told her she would never again be able to have a normal birth. he gave no explanation other than to say that bc she was 8cm and had been pushing for 2 hrs, the way the baby got stuck necessitated a special type of cut into the uterus.<br><br>
today we looked at her operative report, which she got to give to her HB MW. the notes said something like "low transverse incision. the hysterotomy extended below the right lower segment of the uterus".<br><br>
i assume that below the lower segment is the cervix. does this mean he cut her cervix?<br><br>
we took this to mean that his hand slipped and he cut too low on one side. (the same OB messed up my planned vbac 8 yrs ago. my 1st skin incision from a different OB is straight and the 2nd one from this guy is mostly straight but veers up on one end like he slipped with the scalpel, thats why we wonder if he might have jacked up her uterine incision) would vbac be safe in this situation? is this a risk-out in FL?<br><br>
she will be seeing the MW again soon just to drop off the records, and the MW is making her consult with a supposedly vbac friendly OB who is from out of town but travels to our town to do consults for the HB MWs. the consult is not until july and she is due end of aug/early sept. so if she risks out she wont have much time to decide if she should pursue hospital vbac or ERC. she absolutely is not willing to accept the responsibility of UC.
of course the csec was not planned. it also was not emergent. it was due to horrible mismanagement of a labor that deviated from the mother's normal. the next day the OB told her she would never again be able to have a normal birth. he gave no explanation other than to say that bc she was 8cm and had been pushing for 2 hrs, the way the baby got stuck necessitated a special type of cut into the uterus.<br><br>
today we looked at her operative report, which she got to give to her HB MW. the notes said something like "low transverse incision. the hysterotomy extended below the right lower segment of the uterus".<br><br>
i assume that below the lower segment is the cervix. does this mean he cut her cervix?<br><br>
we took this to mean that his hand slipped and he cut too low on one side. (the same OB messed up my planned vbac 8 yrs ago. my 1st skin incision from a different OB is straight and the 2nd one from this guy is mostly straight but veers up on one end like he slipped with the scalpel, thats why we wonder if he might have jacked up her uterine incision) would vbac be safe in this situation? is this a risk-out in FL?<br><br>
she will be seeing the MW again soon just to drop off the records, and the MW is making her consult with a supposedly vbac friendly OB who is from out of town but travels to our town to do consults for the HB MWs. the consult is not until july and she is due end of aug/early sept. so if she risks out she wont have much time to decide if she should pursue hospital vbac or ERC. she absolutely is not willing to accept the responsibility of UC.